+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8
Results 71 to 78 of 78

Indexed Organized Tables

  1. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    Mladen Gogala wrote:

    > On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:17:52 -0600, Florian wrote:
    >
    >
    >>Sometimes multiple records are written at the same time (same second),
    >>so it is impossible for us to create a primary key on the x_timestamp
    >>field, since we might loose records that.

    >
    >
    > Oracle has the data type called TIMESTAMP, which actually goes down to
    > nanosecond. Using that for a primary key is a bad idea.
    >
    >
    >>Yet, we don't want to add any of the other fields to the timestamp since
    >>that doesn't seem to be logical. We tried it and the performance wasn't
    >>that great it seems.

    >
    >
    >
    > You can always have a generated primary key, by using sequences.
    >
    >
    >>Is there no way to create an indexed organized table without using a
    >>primary key??

    >
    >
    > Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in Georgia, Tennessee,
    > South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In Wyoming, Texas, Florida and
    > Alabama you can actually be executed for creating tables without primary
    > key.


    Heck in Texas they seem to be willing to execute you just for not being
    the flavour of the month.
    --
    Daniel A. Morgan
    University of Washington
    damorgan@x.washington.edu
    (replace 'x' with 'u' to respond)

  2. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


  3. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


  4. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


  5. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


  6. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


  7. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


  8. Re: Indexed Organized Tables

    >Creating tables without primary keys is illegal in >Georgia,
    Tennessee,
    >South Carolina, Kentucky and Mississippi. In >Wyoming, Texas, Florida

    and
    >Alabama you can actually be executed for >creating tables without

    primary
    >key.


    Hmmm, so _that's_ why I haven't gotten the Florida Oracle support team
    lately.

    jg
    --
    @home.com is bogus.
    "Don Henley must die." - Mojo Nixon
    http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/b.../index.html#th


+ Reply to Thread
Page 8 of 8 FirstFirst ... 6 7 8