+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 LastLast
Results 31 to 40 of 43

A strange variant of ORA-02391.

  1. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  2. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  3. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  4. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  5. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  6. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  7. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  8. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  9. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


  10. Re: A strange variant of ORA-02391.

    But even in that case, the user limit being "UNLIMITED" it shouldnt be
    giving the error.
    One more doubt, does oracle put an entry in the alert log when it
    reaches reaches the maximum number of sessions that it can accomodate.


+ Reply to Thread
Page 4 of 5 FirstFirst ... 2 3 4 5 LastLast