Terminal Services issue - Paradox Database
This is a discussion on Terminal Services issue - Paradox Database ; Greetings all. One of my clients that uses Terminal Services, with 15 or more users logged in at a time, is having a serious problem. After working normally for days or weeks, no new users can open the application. They ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| Greetings all. One of my clients that uses Terminal Services, with 15 or more users logged in at a time, is having a serious problem. After working normally for days or weeks, no new users can open the application. They say that the users aren't being dropped from TS, and that they don't cancel the TS sessions. The workaround is to get everyone out, and run the Clear Lock Files utility. But, I need to fix the problem instead. I'm at a loss to explain how the lock/net files are getting corrupted (or filled?), so that they have to be purged before they can be used again. Can the application be causing this issue, or is it solely a Runtime (or connection) issue? Does anyone have any insight, or even a good guess? ![]() Pdox 9 Runtime sp3. Thanks, Jim Moseley |
|
#2
| |||
| |||
|
Jim Moseley wrote: > Greetings all. > > One of my clients that uses Terminal Services, with 15 or more users logged > in at a time, is having a serious problem. After working normally for days > or weeks, no new users can open the application. They say that the users > aren't being dropped from TS, and that they don't cancel the TS sessions. > > > The workaround is to get everyone out, and run the Clear Lock Files utility. > But, I need to fix the problem instead. > > I'm at a loss to explain how the lock/net files are getting corrupted (or > filled?), so that they have to be purged before they can be used again. > Can the application be causing this issue, or is it solely a Runtime (or > connection) issue? Does anyone have any insight, or even a good guess? ![]() > > Pdox 9 Runtime sp3. > > Thanks, > Jim Moseley Are they closing TS, and not closing the application/Paradox first? -- --------------- Tony McGuire |
|
#3
| |||
| |||
|
Jim Moseley wrote: > Greetings all. > > One of my clients that uses Terminal Services, with 15 or more users logged > in at a time, is having a serious problem. After working normally for days > or weeks, no new users can open the application. They say that the users > aren't being dropped from TS, and that they don't cancel the TS sessions. > > > The workaround is to get everyone out, and run the Clear Lock Files utility. > But, I need to fix the problem instead. > > I'm at a loss to explain how the lock/net files are getting corrupted (or > filled?), so that they have to be purged before they can be used again. > Can the application be causing this issue, or is it solely a Runtime (or > connection) issue? Does anyone have any insight, or even a good guess? ![]() > > Pdox 9 Runtime sp3. > > Thanks, > Jim Moseley At some point, ALL users AND Paradox must be exited AT THE SAME TIME in order for the lck file to be cleared. Is that ever happening? -- --------------- Tony McGuire |
|
#4
| |||
| |||
|
> At some point, ALL users AND Paradox must be exited AT THE SAME TIME in > order for the lck file to be cleared. if users abort w/o exiting properly, the lock files can get corrupt and they'll never properly clear.. -- Steven Green - Myrtle Beach, South Carolina USA Diamond Software Group http://www.diamondsg.com/main.htm Paradox Support & Sales Diamond Sports Gems http://www.diamondsg.com/gemsmain.htm Sports Memorabilia and Trading Cards "Tony McGuire" news:48f4c6f0@pnews.thedbcommunity.com... > Jim Moseley wrote: >> Greetings all. >> >> One of my clients that uses Terminal Services, with 15 or more users >> logged >> in at a time, is having a serious problem. After working normally for >> days >> or weeks, no new users can open the application. They say that the users >> aren't being dropped from TS, and that they don't cancel the TS sessions. >> The workaround is to get everyone out, and run the Clear Lock Files >> utility. >> But, I need to fix the problem instead. >> >> I'm at a loss to explain how the lock/net files are getting corrupted (or >> filled?), so that they have to be purged before they can be used again. >> Can the application be causing this issue, or is it solely a Runtime (or >> connection) issue? Does anyone have any insight, or even a good guess? >> ![]() >> >> Pdox 9 Runtime sp3. >> >> Thanks, >> Jim Moseley > > > At some point, ALL users AND Paradox must be exited AT THE SAME TIME in > order for the lck file to be cleared. > > Is that ever happening? > > > -- > --------------- > Tony McGuire |
|
#5
| |||
| |||
|
Steven Green wrote: >> At some point, ALL users AND Paradox must be exited AT THE SAME TIME in >> order for the lck file to be cleared. > > if users abort w/o exiting properly, the lock files can get corrupt and > they'll never properly clear.. Which was my first question. Tony |
|
#6
| |||
| |||
| Tony & Steven (and all), The next time it happens, I'll try to login & use the LockWise tool Al Brevelerei wrote to see how many users the BDE thinks are active. Hopefully this points to 'dropped users' causing 'corrupt lock files'. Their manager tells me that he doesn't think the users are getting dropped, but it might happen so often that they've just gotten used to it & stopped complaining. I've asked him to recheck this with all users. Any other guesses, in case this doesn't pan out? Thanks, Jim Moseley |
|
#7
| |||
| |||
|
May not be dropped users, may be just users who log off their session without closing Paradox. Or (as I've seen many times and have been told "never ever happens") users X'ing from their TS session without bothering to close Paradox or log off. Then, of course, the message "too many terminal server users" crops up a day or 3 later. Have a look at the logged users list and see what they have open, then check whether they are "actually" logged in and working. Jim Moseley wrote: > > Their manager tells me that he doesn't think the users are getting dropped, > but it might happen so often that they've just gotten used to it & stopped > complaining. I've asked him to recheck this with all users. > > Any other guesses, in case this doesn't pan out? > > Thanks, > Jim Moseley -- Tom Krieg --------------- http://www.krieg.com.au Please use the contact page to contact me via email |
|
#8
| |||
| |||
|
I think Tom is on the right track. I have the same problem here, users running TS just shuts down without exiting the Paradox app. There are some settings you can look at on the server side, terminal service manager or what it's called, that will let you decide how and when sessions should expire etc. At the moment I have no problem with my TS app - maybe the users have finally understood that they must close Paradox app before closing their TS-session... Anders |
|
#9
| |||
| |||
|
I'm with Tom. My users cannot comprehend that they need to close what's inside the "Remote Desktop Connection" window *before* they close the RDC window (in my case, closing what's in the window will close the RDC window too). You can make it so that when a user reconnects to a terminal server, they reconnect to the same session. You can also make it (as we have) so an app launches automatically and the user doesn't have access to anything other than the app and closing the app closes the session. (if you wish). IMO, your users are closing the session and leaving Paradox running on the server. The really bad part, from my experience, is that timers seem to stop running when the user does this (so my timers to close the forms automatically after n minutes of inactivity only work when the session is open; once the user closes the session, the timer seems to stop). FWIW, Liz Jim Moseley wrote: > Tony & Steven (and all), > > The next time it happens, I'll try to login & use the LockWise tool Al Brevelerei > wrote to see how many users the BDE thinks are active. Hopefully this points > to 'dropped users' causing 'corrupt lock files'. > > Their manager tells me that he doesn't think the users are getting dropped, > but it might happen so often that they've just gotten used to it & stopped > complaining. I've asked him to recheck this with all users. > > Any other guesses, in case this doesn't pan out? > > Thanks, > Jim Moseley |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:41 AM.





Linear Mode