Tiger Stock

[Database Administrator]

On Nov 14, 1:30*pm, Tony Gravagno
wrote:

> my bet has to go
> to InterSystems for Caché and Northgate for Reality.

Isn't that the nobody ever gets fired for going with IBM mentality?

Nothing is a sure bet and I have no issue putting clients on QM.

If they ever went under (a bus?), I would just port them to something
else.

--
Kevin Powick

[Database Administrator]

On Nov 14, 8:17*am, "Jeff Caspari" wrote:
> Hi Eugene,
> I believe the future of D3 is QM.

QM is good for some, but Cache' has an MV-enhanced SQL, along withi an
AJAX framework, combined with scalability that is up there with the
best in the industry
[Ok, on that one I'm believing marketing lit as I don't have first-
hand experience with the scalability yet.]


> If I were looking for work in MV I would be calling all D3 clients and
> offering services to port them to QM.

The bigger shops with heavy connectivity or browser-UI requirements
would likely do better with Cache', U2 or maybe even Reality IMO, but
QM is good too.
--dawn

> Jeff
>
> "eppick77" wrote in message
>
> news:6c9fe352-3517-4eb7-afa7-e2bd1da1cb6c@z6g2000pre.googlegroups.com...
> On Nov 13, 4:07 pm, "Jeff Caspari" wrote:
>
> > Tony,
> > Your time would be better spent offering to port D3 applications to QM.
> > That's a business opportunity now.
> > Jeff
>
> I will be happy to give him a hand - I am porting over a 70 user D3
> system to QM and we are growing it to 100 users.
>
> Eugene