Clustered and Non-clustered Index - sqlserver-programming
This is a discussion on Clustered and Non-clustered Index - sqlserver-programming ; Hi, I have one table having more than 3 millions rows with following columns: [SITE_ID] [USER_NAME] [ACTIVITY_NAME] [PAGE_TYPE] [ACTION] [DOC_ID] [FROM_PAGE] [TO_PAGE] [ORG_NAME] [LOG_DATE_TIME] [SESSION_ID] [IP] [MACHINE_ID] I am using 8 different queries, all thru stored procedure, to fetch data. ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
| |||
| |||
| I have one table having more than 3 millions rows with following columns: [SITE_ID] [USER_NAME] [ACTIVITY_NAME] [PAGE_TYPE] [ACTION] [DOC_ID] [FROM_PAGE] [TO_PAGE] [ORG_NAME] [LOG_DATE_TIME] [SESSION_ID] [IP] [MACHINE_ID] I am using 8 different queries, all thru stored procedure, to fetch data. SITE_ID, USER_NAME, ORG_NAME and ACTION are in all queries WHERE clause. I have created SITE_ID as non-unique clustered index and USER_NAME, ORG_NAME and ACTION as non-unique non-clustered index. Problem is that data fetching without indexs is faster than when creating idex. Is there any problem in index columns. Can you please suggest me a better index plan. I have attached the queries / column table image file. Images file described columns called details ![]() (http://xs434.xs.to/xs434/08513/queries-columns997.jpg or http://xs.to/xs.php?h=xs434&d=08513&...columns997.jpg) Please help.. Thanks Sharma |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:58 PM.





Linear Mode