DVD Tools in Linux - Unix and OS Discussions
This is a discussion on DVD Tools in Linux - Unix and OS Discussions ; On Jun 1, 11:43 am, paul_s wrote: > On Wed, 30 May 2007 19:53:57 +1000, paul_s wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2007 02:29:58 -0700, navti wrote: > > >> But what I am really looking for is a ...
![]() |
| | LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
| |||
| |||
| > On Wed, 30 May 2007 19:53:57 +1000, paul_s wrote: > > On Wed, 30 May 2007 02:29:58 -0700, navti wrote: > > >> But what I am really looking for is a tool which can do more than > >> that. > >> One that can check DVD/CD-ROM specific file format information. > > >> e.g Rockridge, Juliet , ISO9600 etc and tell me if the data DVD I have > >> made is up to scratch. > > > These tools are pretty old, but they may be what you are looking for: > > devdump, isoinfo, isovfy, isodump > > > Some or all may be on your system. If not, they're easy to find from > > google.com/linux > > They also may lead you to more up-to-date tools. > > To complete the question and answer scenario: > Did any of these tools work for you? I tried them and checked out the > man page (isoinfo - which covers all of the above). They seem to be quite > competent at their job. > > If none of these were what you were seeking, did you find any others that > you can share with the viewers? > Paul I have been up to my neck in tons of other stuff lately. I have just switched to OSX and Linux and I am having to learn two new OS, Plus I am writing some training notes on Both OS. Also having a struggle getting my TV card to work in Linux so this is on the back burner,. As soon as I get a chance I will get back to you , Thanks for your reply. |
|
#32
| |||
| |||
|
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:10:10 -0700, navti wrote: > I have been up to my neck in tons of other stuff lately. > > I have just switched to OSX and Linux and I am having to learn two new > OS, > > Plus I am writing some training notes on Both OS. > > Also having a struggle getting my TV card to work in Linux so this is > on the back burner,. > > As soon as I get a chance I will get back to you , > > Thanks for your reply. I gathered that. Noticed your questions covering lots of bits and pieces with a certain "manic" quality. With os x, if it's mostly gui stuff, it'll be a breeze. If it includes the bsd underpinnings, then all the stuff you've been dealing with in this group and with Debian will hold you in good stead. One handy reference book (not fully comprehensive) but useful, is Unix in a Nutshell. I don't really like the "nutshell" series myself, but this has indexes of most of the main commands and states the differences for these between GNU/Linux, OS X, Solaris and BSD. Another O'Reilly publication. Hope it pans out well. Don't forget to breathe. paul_s |
|
#33
| |||
| |||
|
On Jun 1, 1:23 pm, paul_s > On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:10:10 -0700, navti wrote: > > I have been up to my neck in tons of other stuff lately. > > > I have just switched to OSX and Linux and I am having to learn two new > > OS, > > > Plus I am writing some training notes on Both OS. > > > Also having a struggle getting my TV card to work in Linux so this is > > on the back burner,. > > > As soon as I get a chance I will get back to you , > > > Thanks for your reply. > > I gathered that. Noticed your questions covering lots of bits and pieces > with a certain "manic" quality. > > With os x, if it's mostly gui stuff, it'll be a breeze. If it includes > the bsd underpinnings, then all the stuff you've been dealing with in this > group and with Debian will hold you in good stead. > > One handy reference book (not fully comprehensive) but useful, is Unix > in a Nutshell. I don't really like the "nutshell" series myself, but this > has indexes of most of the main commands and states the differences for > these between GNU/Linux, OS X, Solaris and BSD. Another O'Reilly > publication. > > Hope it pans out well. Don't forget to breathe. > I wasted years working with Bnayan Vines then Novell the Microsoft, What a complete waste of time IMO as it is obvious that any desktop OS worthy of the name wil be running some form of UNIX IMO in the near future. |
|
#34
| |||
| |||
|
navti > On Jun 1, 1:23 pm, paul_s >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:10:10 -0700, navti wrote: >> > I have been up to my neck in tons of other stuff lately. >> >> > I have just switched to OSX and Linux and I am having to learn two new >> > OS, >> >> > Plus I am writing some training notes on Both OS. >> >> > Also having a struggle getting my TV card to work in Linux so this is >> > on the back burner,. >> >> > As soon as I get a chance I will get back to you , >> >> > Thanks for your reply. >> >> I gathered that. Noticed your questions covering lots of bits and pieces >> with a certain "manic" quality. >> >> With os x, if it's mostly gui stuff, it'll be a breeze. If it includes >> the bsd underpinnings, then all the stuff you've been dealing with in this >> group and with Debian will hold you in good stead. >> >> One handy reference book (not fully comprehensive) but useful, is Unix >> in a Nutshell. I don't really like the "nutshell" series myself, but this >> has indexes of most of the main commands and states the differences for >> these between GNU/Linux, OS X, Solaris and BSD. Another O'Reilly >> publication. >> >> Hope it pans out well. Don't forget to breathe. >> > I wasted years working with Bnayan Vines then Novell the Microsoft, > > What a complete waste of time IMO as it is obvious that any desktop OS > worthy of the name wil be running some form of UNIX IMO in the near > future. Obvious to who? comp.os.linux.advocacy and the associated madness is ----> thataway. |
|
#35
| |||
| |||
|
On Jun 1, 5:59 pm, Hadron > navti > > On Jun 1, 1:23 pm, paul_s > >> On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 05:10:10 -0700, navti wrote: > >> > I have been up to my neck in tons of other stuff lately. > > >> > I have just switched to OSX and Linux and I am having to learn two new > >> > OS, > > >> > Plus I am writing some training notes on Both OS. > > >> > Also having a struggle getting my TV card to work in Linux so this is > >> > on the back burner,. > > >> > As soon as I get a chance I will get back to you , > > >> > Thanks for your reply. > > >> I gathered that. Noticed your questions covering lots of bits and pieces > >> with a certain "manic" quality. > > >> With os x, if it's mostly gui stuff, it'll be a breeze. If it includes > >> the bsd underpinnings, then all the stuff you've been dealing with in this > >> group and with Debian will hold you in good stead. > > >> One handy reference book (not fully comprehensive) but useful, is Unix > >> in a Nutshell. I don't really like the "nutshell" series myself, but this > >> has indexes of most of the main commands and states the differences for > >> these between GNU/Linux, OS X, Solaris and BSD. Another O'Reilly > >> publication. > > >> Hope it pans out well. Don't forget to breathe. > > > I wasted years working with Bnayan Vines then Novell the Microsoft, > > > What a complete waste of time IMO as it is obvious that any desktop OS > > worthy of the name wil be running some form of UNIX IMO in the near > > future. > > Obvious to who? comp.os.linux.advocacy and the associated madness > is ----> thataway. Well Ive worked with OS2, LanServer, Lanmanager, Netware, Banyan Vines all going the way of the dodo. And of course Windows (almost cost me my sanity that OS did. Not joking.) All that time the UNIX guys were sniggering up their sleeves at me wasting my time with these doomed and soon-to-be doomed OS. Learning Maths is for ever. Once you know how to solve Newton's equation it is never going to stop being correct . Ever. Unix/Unixclone are the closest we have to that in the OS world. The Unix admin I worked beside 10 years ago can still use almost the exact same skills he knew then and apply them to Debian for example. I was busy trying to get Netware Connect to work on a Netware 4.1 File and Print server. I could almost cry thinking about it now. I did then. |
![]() |
« Previous Thread
|
Next Thread »
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
| |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:02 PM.




Linear Mode